Check the working. Explain the marks.
Evaluate handwritten answers against your marking scheme—with partial credit, reasons for deductions and feedback your teachers can review.
A wrong final answer isn’t the whole story.
The method, intermediate steps and explanation matter. Give correct work its credit and make the deduction clear.
- Evaluate the response against your marking criteria.
- Award partial credit for correct working.
- Explain what is missing or incorrect.
- Give students a specific starting point for improvement.
Your papers. A clearer checking workflow.
Keep written assessments. Bring AI into the repetitive checking, with academic review built in.
Set the marking criteria
Share the question paper, expected answers and marking scheme.
Upload answer sheets
Provide clear scans of handwritten responses. Agree on scan quality and formats during setup.
Evaluate the responses
Chanakya reads the answers and suggests marks, deductions and feedback against the criteria.
Review and act
Teachers or faculty review the evaluation and use the gaps to guide revision and support.
Less repetitive checking. More useful feedback.
For class tests, coaching batches and university assessments.
Read handwritten responses
Work from scanned answer sheets. Validate the fit with your handwriting samples and subject formats.
Credit the correct steps
Recognise correct intermediate work under the marking scheme, even when the final answer is wrong.
Explain each deduction
Connect lost marks to a missing point, an incorrect step or an incomplete explanation.
Find what needs revision
Use question-wise results and patterns in errors to choose what to revisit with students.
Work across answer sheets
Bring recurring checking for a class, batch or course into one evaluation workflow.
Review against shared criteria
Give teachers and faculty a common marking reference while retaining their academic judgement.